Learning, teaching and assessment strategy
The trust has a key learning policy that sets out how it believes learners learn and schools follow this policy when designing the curriculum and lessons. Reviews of policy and practice are carried out with collaborative support across the trust. Like any policy the learning policy is reviewed regularly with the adoption of proven improved practice and in light of sound research.
The trust recognises that learning and teaching takes place in many forms and does not dictate an approach. It does, however, expect pupils to progress very well and achieve highly – it is pupil success that illustrates successful teaching. All staff are expected to engage actively with continued professional development. Collaborative development opportunities are a key feature of the trust’s work.
Quality assessment and analysis of outcomes is essential to high achievement and attainment. All schools have formative Assessment for Learning practices firmly embedded and a summative assessment system that can illustrate individual pupil and group progress on a termly basis. Individual schools and the Trust use data to ensure pupil progress and the success of the schools and trust.
RAY ACADEMY TRUST LEARNING POLICY
Thoughts on how learners learn and implications for schools and teaching
These thoughts are not original to RAY Academy Trust (RAY MAT), they are the synthesis of the past and continuing work of many educationalists, researchers and writers. We believe that all our teachers and leaders should be aware of such knowledge and its implication for learning and teaching in our schools.
Learning philosophies and teaching methods
Active learning
In active learning teaching strives to involve pupils in the learning process directly. To learn, pupils must do more than just listen: They must read, write, discuss, or be engaged in solving problems. It relates to learning as knowledge, skills and attitudes. Pupils must engage in higher-order thinking tasks such as analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. Active learning engages pupils in two aspects – doing things and thinking about the things they are doing.
Pupils must be doing things and simultaneously think about the work done and the purpose behind it so that they can enhance their higher order thinking capabilities.
Collaborative learning
Collaborative learning is when two or more people learn or attempt to learn something together. People engaged in collaborative share their knowledge and skills - asking one another for information, evaluating one another's ideas, monitoring one another's work, etc. Learners engage in a common task where each individual depends on and is accountable to each other. Collaborative learning is commonly illustrated when groups of pupils work together to search for understanding, meaning, or solutions or to create an artefact or product of their learning. Collaborative learning activities can include collaborative writing, group projects, joint problem solving, debates, etc.
Didactic teaching
The teacher gives instructions to the pupils who are mostly passive listeners. It is a teacher-centred method of teaching and is content oriented.
The teacher gives instructions, commands, delivers content, and provides necessary information. The pupil activity involves listening and memorisation of the content. It is incumbent on the teacher to ensure delivery and content hold the interest of pupils and avoid a monologue process that hinders learning.
Facilitator of learning
The teacher creates tasks or uses the environment for pupils to learn from. Pupil learning is facilitated through engagement and guidance.
Mastery learning
Mastery learning (initially called "learning for mastery") maintains that pupils must achieve a level of mastery (e.g., 90%) in prerequisite knowledge before moving forward to learn subsequent information. If a pupil does not achieve mastery in an assessment, they are given additional support in learning and reviewing the information and then assessed again. This cycle continues until the learner accomplishes mastery, and they may then move on to the next stage.
The challenge is providing enough time and employing instructional strategies so that all pupils can achieve the same level of learning.
The assumption is pupils can attain a high level of learning capability if:
Instruction is approached sensitively and systematically
Pupils are helped when and where they have learning difficulties
Pupils are given sufficient time to achieve mastery
There is some clear criterion of what constitutes mastery.
There is the question of those pupils that learn more quickly being effectively held back in their learning. Pupils that struggle must be given additional support but those that learn quickly should be allowed to learn more – an argument for differentiated teaching.
Rote learning
This is essentially a memory technique based on repetition. The idea is that one will be able to quickly recall the material the more one repeats it. Rote learning is widely used and particularly important in the mastery of foundation knowledge - phonics in reading, multiplication tables in mathematics, basic formulae, etc.
Rote learning does not enable comprehension or understanding of complex issues or material.
All the philosophies above have practical advantages and disadvantages. The absolute imperative is to choose the best one for your intended objectives.
Lessons need not be in either one or another style. For example, a lesson might start with didactic teaching to give an overview of content and explanation of how something works. Pupils might then engage in active learning or collaborative learning to develop understanding. Basic multiplication tables might require some form of rote learning, solving long multiplication might require didactic teaching and a mastery learning approach, whilst problems requiring the application of multiplication might require active learning.
RAY MAT view –a range of methods are used as appropriate to the learning being sought. Wherever possible learning tasks, lessons, should be differentiated to ensure tasks match the requirements of groups within a class. A more appropriate task match to pupil need leads to greater learning.
Development
Piaget’s stages of cognitive development
Humans go through distinct stages of cognition (ability to think) that are roughly age determined:
Sensorimotor Stage from birth to about 2 years of age.
Information is gathered by the senses, children are very active in constructing understanding of their world through first-hand experience exploring everything.
First habits are developing and working memory develops. Object permanence is being developed - ability to see things in their mind when the object is not physically present.
They are egocentric.
Preoperational Stage from about 2 to around 7 years of age.
Words begin to symbolise objects, actions and ideas. Children are very curious, they explore, they learn through play including pretend play.
They have not developed logic and they are still egocentric. They cannot see from someone else’s point of view
They have not developed ‘conservation’.
Concrete Operational Stage from roughly 7 to 11 years of age.
Children understand conservation and develop logic, They can rearrange their thoughts and use reasoning. Can more readily apply their abilities.
Children begin to know themselves as unique and can put themselves in others shoes. They become less egocentric.
Formal Operational Stage about 12 years old and onwards.
Begin to think rationally about abstract concept. The can understand their own identity and develop moral reasoning and philosophy.
Implications:
Language Predisposition
Each child is born with the strong predisposition to learn language in a particular natural way. To release this language potential virtually all that a child needs is plenty of opportunity to hear people talking and be encouraged to join in. This language predisposition will be neurologically pruned by the age of 4 or 5 and has almost disappeared by age 7. Language is the main means by which we communicate and learn
Implications:
Social skills Predisposition
Humans are predisposed to friendliness within their kin group. Young children have an innate desire to play in social, collaborative, problem-solving ways. Predispositions towards empathetic activity is at its strongest below the age of 6. Failing to provide young children with supportive and nurturing environments where they can develop their predispositions towards social and collaborative skills may result in young children’s brains creating pathways for aggression. This can become the action of first response.
Implications:
Cognitive Apprenticeship
Learning is a collaborative problem-solving activity that occurs through progressive construction of individual knowledge. This takes place in a social context with the learner being apprenticed by a knowledgeable adult.
The learner is motivated to do a task - another person models a task that the learner finds significance in - the other person scaffolds for the tasks the learner finds difficult - there is progressive removal of scaffolding - there is dialogue about the process.
The process has been successfully completed when the learner has developed metacognition – can reflect on their own learning.
Implications:
Brain Plasticity
The more we use our brains in the naturally evolved ways, the more it becomes useable. The most effective learning strategies are those that build on and extend the natural predispositions. Predispositions are latent potentials – if the environment is not appropriate they do not develop.
Implications:
Teacher Expectations
Teachers’ expectations have an extremely powerful positive or negative effect on learning. Low expectations result in underachievement. With high expectations the opposite happens – it builds confidence and self-esteem, a ‘can do’ attitude, and there is the greater likelihood of success. How we view learners and how they think we view them can have a profound effect on their learning
Implications:
Growth Mindset
A person with a growth mindset portrays the following traits that leads to continuous learning and improving achievement through a desire to learn:
Implications:
Learning and teaching
When the brain learns
The brain learns when it is trying to make sense. When it is building on what it already knows, when it recognises the significance of what it is doing: when it is working in complex, multiple perspectives.
Implications:
Schema
A schema can be described as a mental structure of preconceived ideas, a framework representing some aspect of the world, or a system of organizing and perceiving new information. We begin to construct them from birth based on the interactions we experience, to help us understand the world.
People can organize new perceptions into their existing schemata quickly as most situations do not require complex thought when using schema, since automatic thought is all that is required.
Schemata influence attention and learning: people are more likely to notice things that fit into their schema. New information that falls within an individual's schema is easily remembered and incorporated into their worldview.
Schemata have a tendency to remain unchanged, even in the face of contradictory information. They can influence and hamper the learning of new information. A common reaction is to simply ignore or quickly forget the new information. However, when the new information cannot be ignored, existing schemata must be changed or new schemata must be created.
Implications:
Relevance
Learners need to feel that what is being taught is relevant to their own purposes. This relates to another aspect of metacognition, the process of being aware of and in control of ones own knowledge and thinking. Learners control their own learning and in order to reflect on the meaning of what they are learning they must be committed to it.
Implications:
Calibration
Learners learn through a process of first being exposed to new knowledge and then attempting to make sense of that new knowledge in terms of their existing knowledge. This is calibration.
Implications:
Metacognition
Metacognition describes the processes involved when learners plan, monitor, evaluate and make changes to their own learning behaviours. Metacognition has two dimensions: metacognitive knowledge (what learners know about learning) and metacognitive regulation (what learners do about learning). There are 3 metacognition phases – a cyclical reflection on planning – monitoring – evaluating.
Self-regulated learners are aware of their strengths and weaknesses, and can motivate themselves to engage in, and improve, their learning. Developing pupils’ metacognitive knowledge of how they learn—their knowledge of themselves as a learner, of strategies, and of tasks—is an effective way of improving pupil outcomes.
Implications:
Zone of Proximal Development
Knowledge of ZPD is important for direct teacher assisted learning and when setting tasks for independent work. Learning takes place in the zone of proximal development – the gap that exists between the pupils’ performance without assistance and performance with assistance. The components of assisted performance are internalised becoming the learners’ performance.
Implications:
Cognitive load
Cognitive load refers to the effort being used in the working memory. There are three types of cognitive load: intrinsic, extraneous, and germane.
Intrinsic cognitive load - the inherent level of difficulty associated with a specific instructional topic. All instruction has an inherent difficulty associated with it.
Extraneous cognitive load - generated by the manner in which information is presented to learners and is under the control of the teacher. This load can be attributed to the design of the lesson and instructional materials.
Germane cognitive load - the processing, construction and automation of schemas. The work put into creating permanent stores of knowledge.
Working memory is a finite resource and has to handle all 3 types of cognitive load at the same time. To maximise learning teachers need to be aware of the balance between the types of cognitive load. Heavy cognitive load can have negative effects on learning.
The format of instructional materials can limit learning by having a split attention effect. It is beneficial to decrease extraneous cognitive load by reducing distraction thus allowing the learner's attention to deal more readily with the intrinsic demand of the task and the germane cognitive load (schema construction). When intrinsic and/or germane load is high (when a problem is difficult), lessons and tasks should be designed so as to reduce the extraneous load.
Individuals differ in their processing capacity. For example, there are individual differences in processing capacities between novices and experts. Experts have more knowledge or experience with regard to a specific task which reduces the cognitive load associated with the task. Novices do not have this experience or knowledge and thus have heavier cognitive load.
Working memory and cognitive load
The components of working memory are in place at 6 years of age. However, children lack general knowledge, and this creates increased cognitive load. Children in disadvantaged homes often experience even higher cognitive load in learning environments. When it comes to learning, their lack of experience with numbers, words, and concepts increases their cognitive load.
As children grow older they develop better processes and capacities. They also develop metacognition, which helps them to understand their own cognitive activities. Lastly, they gain greater content knowledge through their experiences. These elements help reduce cognitive load as they develop.
Indications of working memory failures include incomplete recall, failing to follow instructions, place-keeping errors and task abandonment.
Reducing cognitive load
Intrinsic cognitive load can be reduced by breaking down the subject content, sequencing the delivery so that sub-tasks are taught individually before being explained together as a whole. The idea is to not overwhelm a pupil too early on in the introduction of new work.
Extraneous cognitive load can be reduced by the way in which instructions are presented. Because we make sense of new material by referencing schema or mental models of pre-existing knowledge a lack of clarity in instruction puts too high a load on the working memory. Too much time is spent problem-solving the instructions as opposed to new schema formation. For example, lessons that use the electronic whiteboard with excessive writing and the teacher talking at the same time, can inadvertently generate excessive cognitive load and lead to working memory failures.
The split-attention effect occurs when different sources of information discussing the same topic are separated by time or space, such as a diagram with a key that corresponds to separate text next to it. When information is presented in this way, it is left to the learner to attempt to amalgamate it, which generates extraneous cognitive load. If one of the sources adds nothing new, it should be eliminated. If it is essential to include both sources, they should ideally be physically integrated (e.g. texts and diagrams combined).
Examples of avoiding cognitive overload:
A good teacher whiteboard (slide) presentation should:
Scaffolding
Scaffolding from the teacher is intended to aid/improve pupil learning. Scaffolding involves presenting learners with guidance that moves them towards their learning goals. Providing guidance is a method of moderating the cognitive load of a learner.
A higher level of guidance is required for complex tasks because these types of task have a higher cognitive load; problem solving for example.
With complex tasks having multiple types of guidance (i.e. worked examples, feedback) can cause them to interact and reinforce each other.
High levels of guidance does not guarantee more learning because certain types of guidance can be extraneous to the learning goals or the modality of learning. If guidance is not appropriate to the learning it can negatively impact on learning, as it gives the learner overwhelming levels of information. However, appropriately designed high levels of guidance, which properly interact with the learning, is more beneficial to learning than low levels of guidance.
Types of scaffolding:
Giving feedback; concise advice on misconceptions as in excellent Assessment for Learning practice.
Intelligence
Learners have the capacity to develop different types of intelligence, that are not fixed, and that increase with learning:
Implications:
Emotional Intelligence
Being emotionally literate is important. Learning takes place through the senses as well as the mind. It happens by reflecting and analysing real experience, making connections between new and old experiences, making choices and making decisions that involve feelings and emotions as well as intellect and reason.
Implications:
Memory
Memorisation for its own sake is a very difficult proposition, made easier if learners have a purpose for committing it to memory. This can be achieved by a frequent need for use or by introducing activities in the form of games etc. Memory is also aided if the aspect to be memorised is frequently revisited in short spells (spaced learning) rather than long spells of learning with long time spans between. Memorising alone is shallow learning. The ability to utilise memory and recognise connections enables deeper learning.
Implications:
Motivation
There is a strong link between emotions and intrinsic motivation. Motivated learners learn more. Learning activities must hold interest for the learner. Learning needs to be enjoyable and seen as worthwhile.
Implications:
High Challenge – Low Stress
Learning takes place in a challenging but non-threatening, supportive environment. The optimal mental state is relaxed alertness – high challenge and low stress.
Implications:
Self-esteem and Resilience
Learning involves taking risks. Learners need to have adequate self-esteem and confidence to feel comfortable about taking such risks. Learners whose self-esteem is eroded by negative feedback and adverse comments learn not to try. Pupils who always succeed do not build resilience. Self-esteem is promoted when challenging tasks, requiring sustained effort are completed successfully.
Implications:
Habits
Both good and bad habits are learnt and difficult to change. Learners need to be taught good habits and these constantly reinforced. Established bad habits are difficult to change.
Implications:
‘Habit of Mind’ that we seek to encourage and enable
Persisting
Managing impulsivity
Listening with understanding and empathy
Thinking systemically
Thinking systematically
Thinking flexibly
Thinking about thinking - metacognition
Striving for accuracy
Questioning and posing problems
Applying past knowledge to new situations
Thinking and communicating with precision
Gathering data through all the senses
Creating, imagining and innovating
Taking responsible risks
Thinking independently
Remaining open to continuous learning
We can encourage the development of habits of mind through:
Where new activities are deemed to be required, they can be developed and assimilated into school schemes after ensuring curriculum ‘progression’ and ‘fit for purpose’ is maintained.
Assessment for Learning (AFL)
AFL is a practice that engages pupils with their own learning. It helps them to take ownership of learning goals and reflect on progress towards those goals. It aids metacognition.
Central to 'Assessment for Learning' is that it:
To improve the quality of assessment for learning we need to:
Model quality:
Give feedback to pupils on their work:
Develop self-assessment and peer assessment
In self-assessment:
For peer assessment:
Talk
Talk is key to learning. It aids all aspects of personal development – social, imaginative and intellectual.
Crucially, children need to be engaged in talk not merely learn through listening to teachers talk. A pupil being engaged in talk is achieved through creating situations in which children discuss ideas and issues, where they are involved in joint problem solving and decision making. Peer assessment encourages talk about learning and talk is a process for learning. Active participation rather than being a passive recipient is required.
Children construct meaning through interactions with others in different contexts and with different experiences – they personally construct their own knowledge. As teachers we enable connection between what is ‘already known’ by children and ‘new’ knowledge. Our goal is to have appropriate talk in all lessons.
Considering its importance, we all have to be good at talking. Teachers have to have high functional competence –clearly and precisely express points of view and convey information to a wide variety of audiences. We also have to enable our pupils to be increasingly functionally competent speakers. This includes encouraging and developing the use of standard spoken English in appropriate situations.
Precise language must be used with children regardless of the type of talk we are engaged in. We must always consider who we are talking to and pitch what we say and ask appropriately. Pupils should also learn to do this.
Questioning is a major element of teacher talk. However, it is only one element of teacher talk and can be overused. This is particularly evident at the beginning of a lesson or topic. It is often better to use exposition and demonstration rather than ask questions in a question and answer style. This is particularly so if ‘closed’ questions are asked.
It can be a mistake to ask a question instead of giving a task instruction – do not ask a pupil if they would like to do something when you actually want them to; otherwise they can rightly refuse.
Used well, though, questioning is an excellent tool to encourage learning. Questions can:
An easy classification is to say there are 2 types of question. Closed questions for which there is a single correct answer and the answer is been pre-determined by the questioner, e.g. ‘What is the capital city of France?’ Open Questions where a variety of responses could be acceptable and where there may be no ‘correct’ answer, e.g. ‘How would you assess the character of …?’
Open questions demand thought and analysis. They encourage new learning and enable new knowledge. Closed questions merely seek memory recall – access to existing knowledge.
Because good questioning can aid learning, encourage and help pupils to become good at asking questions.